When developing software, it’s important to follow certain principles to make the code flexible, easy to maintain, and scalable. SOLID design principles are a set of guidelines that help developers create better-structured, more manageable code.

SOLID principles are particularly useful in object-oriented programming (OOP). These principles make sure that the system is easier to understand, more adaptable to change, and less prone to bugs. Let’s take a look at each of these principles.

The SOLID Principles

S - Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)

The Single Responsibility Principle states that a class should have only one reason to change. In other words, a class should only do one thing or be responsible for one task. This makes the system simpler, as each class has a specific responsibility. If something needs to change, it will only affect that class.

O - Open/Closed Principle (OCP)

The Open/Closed Principle means that software entities (like classes or methods) should be open for extension but closed for modification. This allows developers to extend the functionality of existing classes without changing the class itself. The goal is to avoid making unnecessary changes to existing code, which can introduce new bugs.

L - Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)

The Liskov Substitution Principle ensures that objects of a subclass should be able to replace objects of the superclass without affecting the correctness of the program. This means subclasses should not break the functionality defined in the parent class, ensuring consistent behavior across the system.

I - Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)

The Interface Segregation Principle advises that clients should not be forced to depend on interfaces they do not use. Instead of having one large interface, break it down into smaller, more specific ones. This way, each class implements only the methods it needs, making the code cleaner and easier to work with.

D - Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)

The Dependency Inversion Principle states that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules. Both should depend on abstractions. This principle reduces tight coupling between modules, making the system more flexible and easier to modify. It helps create loosely coupled code by relying on abstractions rather than concrete implementations.