0% completed
Overview
The problem at hand is ensuring the ordered execution of methods across different threads. Essentially, we have three methods: first()
, second()
, and third()
. The objective is to guarantee that irrespective of the order in the threads are triggered or scheduled, first()
must execute before second()
, and second()
must execute before third()
.
In concurrent programming, it's challenging to ensure the execution order because the operating system can schedule threads in any sequence. This means even if you start thread A (that calls first()
) before thread B (that calls second()
), there's no guarantee A will execute before B.
To ensure the desired order of execution, we need to use synchronization primitives. These primitives will block or allow threads to proceed based on certain conditions, thus ensuring our desired order.
Step-by-step Algorithm
To solve this problem, we need synchronization mechanisms that will enable one thread to wait until another thread completes its task. For this, we'll use semaphores.
Semaphores are signaling mechanisms. A thread waiting (or sleeping) on a semaphore can be notified to wake up by another thread which signals the semaphore. For our scenario:
- Initialize two semaphores:
semFirstDone
andsemSecondDone
. semFirstDone
will be signaled oncefirst()
completes. Until then, any thread trying to executesecond()
will wait.- Similarly,
semSecondDone
will be signaled oncesecond()
completes. Until then, any thread trying to executethird()
will wait.
initialize semFirstDone = 0 // This means no thread can pass without a signal initialize semSecondDone = 0 // Same for this semaphore function first(): // execute the 'first' task print("first") signal semFirstDone // Inform that the 'first' task is done function second(): wait on semFirstDone // Wait until 'first' is done // execute the 'second' task print("second") signal semSecondDone // Inform that the 'second' task is done function third(): wait on semSecondDone // Wait until 'second' is done // execute the 'third' task print("third")
The key insight here is that semFirstDone
starts at 0, so any thread calling second()
will have to wait until it's signaled. Similarly, semSecondDone
ensures the third()
function waits for second()
to complete. This setup guarantees our desired order of execution, regardless of the order in which threads are started.
1 of 4
.....
.....
.....
Table of Contents
Contents are not accessible
Contents are not accessible
Contents are not accessible
Contents are not accessible
Contents are not accessible