What techniques can be used to define a class in JavaScript, and what are their trade-offs?

Free Coding Questions Catalog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog. Take a step towards a better tech career now!

Techniques to Define a Class in JavaScript and Their Trade-offs

In JavaScript, there are multiple ways to define and work with classes, each with its own strengths and limitations. The most common techniques are:

  1. Using ES6 class Syntax
  2. Using Constructor Functions
  3. Using Factory Functions

1. Using ES6 class Syntax

Example

class Person { constructor(name, age) { this.name = name; this.age = age; } greet() { return `Hello, my name is ${this.name}`; } } const person = new Person("Alice", 30); console.log(person.greet());

Trade-offs

  • Advantages:

    1. Modern and Readable: The class syntax is concise and aligns with OOP paradigms, making it easier for developers from OOP backgrounds (e.g., Java, Python) to understand.
    2. Built-in Prototypes: Methods defined in the class body are automatically added to the prototype, reducing memory usage.
    3. Inheritance: Supports easy inheritance with extends and super.
  • Disadvantages:

    1. Less Flexible: The class syntax is more rigid and lacks flexibility compared to other techniques like factory functions.
    2. Not Hoisted: Unlike function declarations, class declarations are not hoisted, meaning you cannot use a class before defining it.
    3. No Private Fields (Before ES2021): Older versions of JavaScript don’t support private fields, requiring workarounds like closures.

2. Using Constructor Functions

Example

function Person(name, age) { this.name = name; this.age = age; } Person.prototype.greet = function () { return `Hello, my name is ${this.name}`; }; const person = new Person("Bob", 25); console.log(person.greet());

Trade-offs

  • Advantages:

    1. Backwards Compatibility: Works in all JavaScript environments, including older browsers.
    2. Explicit Control: The prototype chain and inheritance are explicitly defined, allowing more granular control.
  • Disadvantages:

    1. Verbose Syntax: Requires manual addition of methods to the prototype, which is less concise than the class syntax.
    2. Prone to Errors: Forgetting to use new when calling the constructor can lead to bugs by creating global variables.

3. Using Factory Functions

Example

function createPerson(name, age) { return { name, age, greet() { return `Hello, my name is ${this.name}`; } }; } const person = createPerson("Charlie", 35); console.log(person.greet());

Trade-offs

  • Advantages:

    1. Flexibility: Factory functions are highly flexible and can return objects with varying shapes or configurations.
    2. No this Binding Issues: Since methods are defined directly in the returned object, there’s no need to bind this.
    3. Functional Paradigm: Works well with functional programming techniques and avoids OOP entirely.
    4. Private Data: Can use closures to achieve true private variables.
    function createPerson(name, age) { return { greet() { return `Hello, my name is ${name}`; // Accesses private `name` } }; } const person = createPerson("Eve", 40); console.log(person.greet());
  • Disadvantages:

    1. Performance Overhead: Methods are re-created for each instance, increasing memory usage compared to prototype-based techniques.
    2. No Prototypal Inheritance: Lacks built-in support for prototypal inheritance, requiring manual handling if needed.

Additional Considerations

Prototypal Inheritance

JavaScript's prototypal inheritance system allows objects to inherit directly from other objects. This can be combined with any of the techniques above but is more explicit when using constructor functions or factory functions.

Example:

const parent = { greet() { return "Hello from parent!"; } }; const child = Object.create(parent); console.log(child.greet()); // Output: "Hello from parent!"

Mixins for Shared Behavior

Mixins allow for sharing behavior between classes or objects without strict inheritance.

Example:

const greetMixin = { greet() { return `Hello, ${this.name}`; } }; function createPerson(name) { const person = Object.create(greetMixin); person.name = name; return person; } const person = createPerson("Dave"); console.log(person.greet());

Choosing the Right Technique

Use CaseRecommended Technique
Modern JavaScript projectsES6 class syntax
Compatibility with old environmentsConstructor functions
Functional programming or closuresFactory functions
Flexibility and no this issuesFactory functions
Performance-critical applicationsES6 class syntax or Constructor functions
Private data encapsulationFactory functions with closures

Each technique has its strengths and weaknesses. For most modern applications, ES6 class syntax is preferred for its readability and built-in support for inheritance, while factory functions excel in flexibility and functional programming paradigms.

TAGS
Coding Interview
CONTRIBUTOR
Design Gurus Team
-

GET YOUR FREE

Coding Questions Catalog

Design Gurus Newsletter - Latest from our Blog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog.
Take a step towards a better tech career now!
Explore Answers
What does CV stand for?
Do and don'ts of technical interview?
How long is a software internship?
Related Courses
Image
Grokking the Coding Interview: Patterns for Coding Questions
Grokking the Coding Interview Patterns in Java, Python, JS, C++, C#, and Go. The most comprehensive course with 476 Lessons.
Image
Grokking Data Structures & Algorithms for Coding Interviews
Unlock Coding Interview Success: Dive Deep into Data Structures and Algorithms.
Image
Grokking Advanced Coding Patterns for Interviews
Master advanced coding patterns for interviews: Unlock the key to acing MAANG-level coding questions.
Image
One-Stop Portal For Tech Interviews.
Copyright © 2025 Design Gurus, LLC. All rights reserved.