What are good interview feedback examples?
High-quality interview feedback goes beyond a simple “you did well” or “you need improvement.” It pinpoints specific strengths and growth areas, providing actionable insights that help the candidate (or interviewee) refine their skills. Below are examples of good interview feedback you might give or receive, covering coding, system design, and behavioral dimensions.
1. Coding Interview Feedback Examples
a. Positive Feedback
-
“Your approach to the binary search problem was efficient and well-structured, with clear time complexity considerations (O(log n)). You also did a great job explaining each step as you coded.”
Why this is good: It highlights a specific data structure/algorithm (binary search), praises efficiency, and commends transparent communication. -
“Excellent usage of the Sliding Window pattern to handle the subarray sum problem. You neatly handled edge cases by discussing what happens when the array contains negative numbers.”
Why this is good: It references a specific coding pattern (Sliding Window), calls out handling edge cases, and shows the interviewer recognizes technique and depth.
b. Constructive Feedback
-
“You solved the problem correctly but took extra time to clarify the problem requirements. In a real interview, be sure to ask clarifying questions earlier to manage time better.”
Why this is helpful: It points out a process improvement (ask clarifying questions early) and shows time management is an issue. -
“Your solution works, but consider optimizing space usage. Discussing time/space complexity more explicitly could strengthen your presentation.”
Why this is helpful: It calls out room for optimization and suggests the candidate delve deeper into Big-O complexities.
Action Step: If you find yourself consistently struggling with coding patterns or complexities, consider Grokking the Coding Interview: Patterns for Coding Questions for a structured approach to tackling common interview problems.
2. System Design Interview Feedback Examples
a. Positive Feedback
-
“You did a great job outlining the high-level architecture for a messaging system. Introducing microservices for user management and message queues for asynchronous processing clearly demonstrated your understanding of scalability.”
Why this is good: It details which aspects of the design stood out (microservices, queues), indicating in-depth architectural knowledge. -
“Your solution effectively addressed key components like load balancing, caching, and failover strategies. You also explained trade-offs between NoSQL and SQL databases with clear reasoning.”
Why this is good: It praises technical choices and the ability to articulate trade-offs—key in system design interviews.
b. Constructive Feedback
-
“While you identified user workflow, you didn’t dive deep into how data would be partitioned for high-traffic scenarios. In a real system design discussion, be sure to detail how you’d scale your database through sharding or replication.”
Why this is helpful: It encourages more thorough coverage of scalability details—a common pitfall in system design discussions. -
“You covered the architecture well but didn’t mention how you’d monitor or log system events. In real-world scenarios, teams rely heavily on logging and monitoring to maintain system health.”
Why this is helpful: It points out an often-overlooked area (monitoring and logging) that differentiates a superficial design from a production-ready one.
Action Step: If advanced architectural components or scale-out strategies are challenging, explore Grokking the System Design Interview or specialized System Design Mock Interviews at DesignGurus.io.
3. Behavioral Interview Feedback Examples
a. Positive Feedback
-
“Your STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result) responses were clearly structured and concise. The example of resolving a team conflict really showcased your leadership skills and empathy.”
Why this is good: It highlights structure (STAR method) and praises strong soft skills with a specific example. -
“You tied your project management style back to key company values such as customer obsession and ownership, demonstrating cultural alignment.”
Why this is good: Employers love seeing how candidates connect their behaviors or experiences to core company values.
b. Constructive Feedback
-
“Your anecdote about handling a deadline crunch was relevant, but you focused mostly on the technical details. In a behavioral interview, balance technical info with team-oriented factors—like how you communicated with stakeholders.”
Why this is helpful: It points out the need to address the human side (stakeholder communication, team collaboration) rather than just the technical aspects. -
“When discussing conflicts with coworkers, try offering more context on how you resolved disagreements. Showcasing your approach to compromise or negotiation can strengthen your answer.”
Why this is helpful: It guides the candidate to provide deeper insight into conflict resolution strategies.
Action Step: If you’re looking to refine storytelling or conflict-resolution skills, Grokking Modern Behavioral Interview provides frameworks and practice questions that align with real-world corporate values and scenarios.
4. Leadership and Management Interview Feedback
a. Positive Feedback
- “Your explanation of how you empower junior engineers by setting clear goals and providing timely feedback showed strong coaching and mentorship capabilities.”
Why this is good: It underscores the candidate’s leadership style and the positive impact on team development.
b. Constructive Feedback
- “While you demonstrated good decision-making in budget allocation, exploring risk management strategies (like fallback plans) would have strengthened your argument.”
Why this is helpful: Leaders must consider risk mitigation, so this feedback points to an area for deeper strategic thinking.
Action Step: For those stepping into or already in managerial roles, Grokking the Engineering Manager Interview offers tailored scenarios and best practices to enhance leadership-focused discussions.
5. General Format Tips for Good Feedback
-
Be Specific
- Reference a particular question or scenario (e.g., “the BFS approach on the shortest path problem”).
- Cite metrics like complexity or response time if relevant.
-
Offer Actionable Suggestions
- Instead of saying “be better at data structures,” recommend specific steps: “Review tree traversal methods and practice implementing BFS/DFS to handle edge cases.”
-
Balance Positives and Negatives
- Mention one or two standout strengths, then follow up with constructive areas to focus on.
- This balanced approach keeps the candidate motivated while showing a clear path to improvement.
-
Encourage Continuous Improvement
- Invite follow-up questions or additional sessions (e.g., “Feel free to schedule another mock interview once you’ve practiced these concepts.”).
Conclusion
Good interview feedback is precise, actionable, and balanced. It spotlights what the candidate did well—whether it’s coding structure, system design trade-offs, or leadership qualities—and outlines specific ways to level up in weaker areas. By providing (or seeking) feedback that goes beyond generic praise or criticism, you (or the interviewee) can systematically improve and become more interview-ready.
If you’re looking for professional guidance or more targeted mock interviews—coding, system design, or behavioral—check out DesignGurus.io Mock Interviews. With customized feedback from ex-FAANG engineers, you can accelerate growth and arrive at your next interview prepared to shine.
GET YOUR FREE
Coding Questions Catalog