3161. Block Placement Queries - Detailed Explanation

Free Coding Questions Catalog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog. Take a step towards a better tech career now!

Problem Statement

Description:
You are given a sequence of queries, where each query is an integer that represents a desired block placement index on an infinite one-dimensional line (or array). Initially, all positions are free.

For each query, you need to “place” a block at the desired position or—if that position is already occupied—at the next available (free) position to the right. Once a block is placed at a position, that position becomes occupied, and subsequent queries that request that same position (or any position whose available spot was already taken) must move to the next free slot.

Your Task:
Return the result for each query as the final index where the block was placed.

Example Inputs, Outputs, and Explanations

  1. Example 1:

    • Input: queries = [1, 2, 1, 2]
    • Output: [1, 2, 3, 4]
    • Explanation:
      • Query 1: Request index 1 → free, so place a block at 1.
      • Query 2: Request index 2 → free, so place a block at 2.
      • Query 3: Request index 1 → already occupied; next free index is 3 → place a block at 3.
      • Query 4: Request index 2 → already occupied; next free index is 4 → place a block at 4.
  2. Example 2:

    • Input: queries = [5, 5, 5]
    • Output: [5, 6, 7]
    • Explanation:
      • Query 1: Request index 5 → free, so place at 5.
      • Query 2: Request index 5 → index 5 is occupied; next free is 6.
      • Query 3: Request index 5 → indices 5 and 6 are occupied; next free is 7.
  3. Example 3 (Edge Case):

    • Input: queries = [10]
    • Output: [10]
    • Explanation:
      • A single query that requests index 10, which is free, so the block is placed at 10.

Constraints

  • The number of queries can be large.
  • The queries are non-negative integers.
  • The positions extend to infinity (or a very large number), so the solution should not preallocate an array for all positions.
  • A block, once placed at a position, makes that position unavailable for future queries.

Hints to Approach the Solution

  1. Next Available Position Problem:

    • Think of each query as “find the next free slot at or after index x.”
    • A naïve approach might iterate from x upward until a free position is found, but that would be too slow for many queries.
  2. Union-Find / Disjoint Set (DSU):

    • Notice that the problem can be modeled using union–find (or DSU) by “linking” an occupied position to the next candidate free position.
    • When you place a block at position x, update the structure so that the next query for position x (or any query landing on it) will immediately jump to the next free index (i.e. x + 1).
  3. Path Compression:

    • Using union–find with path compression ensures that subsequent queries run in nearly constant time (amortized).

Approach 1: Naïve Linear Scan

Explanation

  • Method: For each query, starting from the requested index, iterate to the right until you find a free position.
  • Drawback: In the worst case, if many consecutive positions are occupied, the scan can be very slow (O(n) per query), leading to an overall inefficient solution.

Approach 2: Union-Find (Optimal)

Explanation

  • Idea: Use a union–find data structure (also known as DSU) to track the next available free index.
  • How It Works:
    • Initialization:
      • No positions are occupied initially.
    • Find Function:
      • Implement a find(x) function that returns the smallest available position at or after x. If x is free, then find(x) = x; if not, recursively find the next free position.
    • Placement (Union):
      • When a block is placed at position x, mark it as occupied by “unioning” it with x + 1. This means that for future queries, the next available position will be determined by find(x + 1).
    • Processing a Query:
      • For a query with desired index x, compute pos = find(x). Then place the block at pos and update the union–find structure by setting parent[pos] = pos + 1. Return pos as the answer for that query.

Pseudocode

initialize parent as an empty hash map

function find(x):
    if x is not in parent:
         return x
    parent[x] = find(parent[x])
    return parent[x]

function placeBlock(x):
    pos = find(x)
    parent[pos] = pos + 1
    return pos

for each query in queries:
    answer[i] = placeBlock(query)
return answer

Code Implementations

Python Code

Python3
Python3

. . . .

Java Code

Java
Java

. . . .

Complexity Analysis

  • Time Complexity:

    • Each query is processed using a union–find find operation with path compression.
    • The amortized time complexity per query is nearly O(α(N)), where α(N) is the inverse Ackermann function (which is practically constant).
    • Overall, if there are Q queries, the time complexity is O(Q * α(N)).
  • Space Complexity:

    • The extra space used is proportional to the number of unique positions occupied, which in the worst case can be O(Q).

Step-by-Step Walkthrough (Visual Example)

Consider the input queries = [1, 2, 1, 2]:

  1. Query 1:

    • Desired index: 1
    • find(1) returns 1 (since 1 is free)
    • Place block at 1 → update parent[1] = 2
    • Result so far: [1]
  2. Query 2:

    • Desired index: 2
    • find(2) returns 2 (free)
    • Place block at 2 → update parent[2] = 3
    • Result so far: [1, 2]
  3. Query 3:

    • Desired index: 1
    • find(1) follows parent: parent[1] = 2, then find(2) returns 3
    • Place block at 3 → update parent[3] = 4
    • Result so far: [1, 2, 3]
  4. Query 4:

    • Desired index: 2
    • find(2) returns 3 but 3 is now occupied; following parent chain, find(3) returns 4
    • Place block at 4 → update parent[4] = 5
    • Final result: [1, 2, 3, 4]

Common Mistakes & Edge Cases

Common Mistakes

  • Naïve Scanning:
    • Iterating from the desired index until a free position is found for each query without using union–find can lead to timeouts.
  • Forgetting Path Compression:
    • Not implementing path compression in union–find can result in slower performance for many queries.
  • Incorrect Updates:
    • Failing to update the parent pointer after placing a block may cause incorrect results for subsequent queries.

Edge Cases

  • Single Query:
    • A single query should simply return the desired index.
  • Repeated Queries for the Same Index:
    • Multiple queries for the same index should correctly “jump” to the next free positions.
  • Large Query Values:
    • The solution should work efficiently even when queries request large indices.

Variations

  • Range Queries:
    • Variations might include queries that ask for free positions within a range.
  • Dynamic Removal:
    • Another variant could allow removal of blocks, requiring a more complex union–find or segment tree solution.
  • Design Memory Allocator
  • Seat Reservation Manager
  • Exam Room
TAGS
leetcode
CONTRIBUTOR
Design Gurus Team
-

GET YOUR FREE

Coding Questions Catalog

Design Gurus Newsletter - Latest from our Blog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog.
Take a step towards a better tech career now!
Explore Answers
Related Courses
Grokking the Coding Interview: Patterns for Coding Questions
Grokking the Coding Interview Patterns in Java, Python, JS, C++, C#, and Go. The most comprehensive course with 476 Lessons.
Grokking Modern AI Fundamentals
Master the fundamentals of AI today to lead the tech revolution of tomorrow.
Grokking Data Structures & Algorithms for Coding Interviews
Unlock Coding Interview Success: Dive Deep into Data Structures and Algorithms.
Image
One-Stop Portal For Tech Interviews.
Copyright © 2025 Design Gurus, LLC. All rights reserved.
;