3161. Block Placement Queries - Detailed Explanation

Free Coding Questions Catalog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog. Take a step towards a better tech career now!

Problem Statement

Description:
You are given a sequence of queries, where each query is an integer that represents a desired block placement index on an infinite one-dimensional line (or array). Initially, all positions are free.

For each query, you need to “place” a block at the desired position or—if that position is already occupied—at the next available (free) position to the right. Once a block is placed at a position, that position becomes occupied, and subsequent queries that request that same position (or any position whose available spot was already taken) must move to the next free slot.

Your Task:
Return the result for each query as the final index where the block was placed.

Example Inputs, Outputs, and Explanations

  1. Example 1:

    • Input: queries = [1, 2, 1, 2]
    • Output: [1, 2, 3, 4]
    • Explanation:
      • Query 1: Request index 1 → free, so place a block at 1.
      • Query 2: Request index 2 → free, so place a block at 2.
      • Query 3: Request index 1 → already occupied; next free index is 3 → place a block at 3.
      • Query 4: Request index 2 → already occupied; next free index is 4 → place a block at 4.
  2. Example 2:

    • Input: queries = [5, 5, 5]
    • Output: [5, 6, 7]
    • Explanation:
      • Query 1: Request index 5 → free, so place at 5.
      • Query 2: Request index 5 → index 5 is occupied; next free is 6.
      • Query 3: Request index 5 → indices 5 and 6 are occupied; next free is 7.
  3. Example 3 (Edge Case):

    • Input: queries = [10]
    • Output: [10]
    • Explanation:
      • A single query that requests index 10, which is free, so the block is placed at 10.

Constraints

  • The number of queries can be large.
  • The queries are non-negative integers.
  • The positions extend to infinity (or a very large number), so the solution should not preallocate an array for all positions.
  • A block, once placed at a position, makes that position unavailable for future queries.

Hints to Approach the Solution

  1. Next Available Position Problem:

    • Think of each query as “find the next free slot at or after index x.”
    • A naïve approach might iterate from x upward until a free position is found, but that would be too slow for many queries.
  2. Union-Find / Disjoint Set (DSU):

    • Notice that the problem can be modeled using union–find (or DSU) by “linking” an occupied position to the next candidate free position.
    • When you place a block at position x, update the structure so that the next query for position x (or any query landing on it) will immediately jump to the next free index (i.e. x + 1).
  3. Path Compression:

    • Using union–find with path compression ensures that subsequent queries run in nearly constant time (amortized).

Approach 1: Naïve Linear Scan

Explanation

  • Method: For each query, starting from the requested index, iterate to the right until you find a free position.
  • Drawback: In the worst case, if many consecutive positions are occupied, the scan can be very slow (O(n) per query), leading to an overall inefficient solution.

Approach 2: Union-Find (Optimal)

Explanation

  • Idea: Use a union–find data structure (also known as DSU) to track the next available free index.
  • How It Works:
    • Initialization:
      • No positions are occupied initially.
    • Find Function:
      • Implement a find(x) function that returns the smallest available position at or after x. If x is free, then find(x) = x; if not, recursively find the next free position.
    • Placement (Union):
      • When a block is placed at position x, mark it as occupied by “unioning” it with x + 1. This means that for future queries, the next available position will be determined by find(x + 1).
    • Processing a Query:
      • For a query with desired index x, compute pos = find(x). Then place the block at pos and update the union–find structure by setting parent[pos] = pos + 1. Return pos as the answer for that query.

Pseudocode

initialize parent as an empty hash map

function find(x):
    if x is not in parent:
         return x
    parent[x] = find(parent[x])
    return parent[x]

function placeBlock(x):
    pos = find(x)
    parent[pos] = pos + 1
    return pos

for each query in queries:
    answer[i] = placeBlock(query)
return answer

Code Implementations

Python Code

Python3
Python3

. . . .

Java Code

Java
Java

. . . .

Complexity Analysis

  • Time Complexity:

    • Each query is processed using a union–find find operation with path compression.
    • The amortized time complexity per query is nearly O(α(N)), where α(N) is the inverse Ackermann function (which is practically constant).
    • Overall, if there are Q queries, the time complexity is O(Q * α(N)).
  • Space Complexity:

    • The extra space used is proportional to the number of unique positions occupied, which in the worst case can be O(Q).

Step-by-Step Walkthrough (Visual Example)

Consider the input queries = [1, 2, 1, 2]:

  1. Query 1:

    • Desired index: 1
    • find(1) returns 1 (since 1 is free)
    • Place block at 1 → update parent[1] = 2
    • Result so far: [1]
  2. Query 2:

    • Desired index: 2
    • find(2) returns 2 (free)
    • Place block at 2 → update parent[2] = 3
    • Result so far: [1, 2]
  3. Query 3:

    • Desired index: 1
    • find(1) follows parent: parent[1] = 2, then find(2) returns 3
    • Place block at 3 → update parent[3] = 4
    • Result so far: [1, 2, 3]
  4. Query 4:

    • Desired index: 2
    • find(2) returns 3 but 3 is now occupied; following parent chain, find(3) returns 4
    • Place block at 4 → update parent[4] = 5
    • Final result: [1, 2, 3, 4]

Common Mistakes & Edge Cases

Common Mistakes

  • Naïve Scanning:
    • Iterating from the desired index until a free position is found for each query without using union–find can lead to timeouts.
  • Forgetting Path Compression:
    • Not implementing path compression in union–find can result in slower performance for many queries.
  • Incorrect Updates:
    • Failing to update the parent pointer after placing a block may cause incorrect results for subsequent queries.

Edge Cases

  • Single Query:
    • A single query should simply return the desired index.
  • Repeated Queries for the Same Index:
    • Multiple queries for the same index should correctly “jump” to the next free positions.
  • Large Query Values:
    • The solution should work efficiently even when queries request large indices.

Variations

  • Range Queries:
    • Variations might include queries that ask for free positions within a range.
  • Dynamic Removal:
    • Another variant could allow removal of blocks, requiring a more complex union–find or segment tree solution.
  • Design Memory Allocator
  • Seat Reservation Manager
  • Exam Room
TAGS
leetcode
CONTRIBUTOR
Design Gurus Team
-

GET YOUR FREE

Coding Questions Catalog

Design Gurus Newsletter - Latest from our Blog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog.
Take a step towards a better tech career now!
Explore Answers
What is the difference between QA and testing?
What is asked in a system design interview?
Which framework can be used to develop cross-platform applications?
Related Courses
Image
Grokking the Coding Interview: Patterns for Coding Questions
Grokking the Coding Interview Patterns in Java, Python, JS, C++, C#, and Go. The most comprehensive course with 476 Lessons.
Image
Grokking Modern AI Fundamentals
Master the fundamentals of AI today to lead the tech revolution of tomorrow.
Image
Grokking Data Structures & Algorithms for Coding Interviews
Unlock Coding Interview Success: Dive Deep into Data Structures and Algorithms.
Image
One-Stop Portal For Tech Interviews.
Copyright © 2025 Design Gurus, LLC. All rights reserved.
;