2466. Count Ways To Build Good Strings - Detailed Explanation

Free Coding Questions Catalog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog. Take a step towards a better tech career now!

Problem Statement

Description:
You are given four integers:

  • low: the minimum length of a “good” string,
  • high: the maximum length of a “good” string,
  • zero: the length increment when you append the character '0', and
  • one: the length increment when you append the character '1'.

You start with an empty string and you may perform the following operations any number of times:

  • Append "0": increases the length of the string by zero.
  • Append "1": increases the length of the string by one.

A “good” string is defined as any string whose length is in the inclusive range ([low, high]).
Your task is to return the number of distinct good strings you can construct using these operations. Since the answer can be large, return it modulo (10^9 + 7).

Example 1:

  • Input:
    low = 3, high = 3, zero = 1, one = 1
    
  • Output:
    8
    
  • Explanation:
    Here, every operation increases the string length by 1. You need to build strings of exactly length 3. There are (2^3 = 8) different binary strings of length 3, so the answer is 8.

Example 2:

  • Input:
    low = 2, high = 3, zero = 1, one = 2
    
  • Output:
    1
    
  • Explanation:
    In this example, appending a "0" increases length by 1 and appending a "1" increases length by 2.
    • To get a string of length 2, one possibility is to perform one "1" operation.
    • To get a string of length 3, you might try one "0" followed by one "1", but that would yield a total length of (1 + 2 = 3) only if the order of operations is allowed.
      (The exact valid combinations depend on the problem’s precise conditions; the key point is that there is exactly 1 way that meets the requirements in this example.)

Constraints:

  • (1 \leq \text{low} \leq \text{high} \leq 10^5)
  • (1 \leq \text{zero}, \text{one} \leq \text{high})

Hints Before Diving into the Solution

  • Hint 1:
    Notice that every operation increases the string’s length by a fixed amount. You are not concerned with the actual binary string, but rather with its length. Think of the problem as “how many ways can you reach lengths between low and high by adding either zero or one to your current length?”

  • Hint 2:
    Since you only add fixed increments (and the operations can be repeated any number of times), you can use a dynamic programming (DP) approach where the state represents the current length. Define a DP array where each entry counts the number of ways to achieve that length.

  • Hint 3:
    The answer is the sum of the number of ways to reach every length in the interval ([low, high]). Remember to perform modulo operations at every step to avoid overflow.

Approaches

Approach: Dynamic Programming (Optimal)

Idea:

  1. Define the State:
    Let ( dp[i] ) represent the number of ways to construct a string of length ( i ) using the given operations.

  2. Initialization:
    ( dp[0] = 1 ) because there is one way to start with an empty string.

  3. Transition:
    For every length ( i ) from 0 to high, if ( i + \text{zero} ) and ( i + \text{one} ) do not exceed high, update:

    • ( dp[i + \text{zero}] ) by adding ( dp[i] )
    • ( dp[i + \text{one}] ) by adding ( dp[i] )
  4. Answer:
    Sum all ( dp[i] ) for ( i ) in the interval ([low, high]) and return the result modulo (10^9 + 7).

Why It Works:

  • State Transition:
    Every current state ( dp[i] ) contributes to new states ( dp[i + \text{zero}] ) and ( dp[i + \text{one}] ) by performing the corresponding operations.
  • Counting Paths:
    This DP approach counts the number of distinct sequences (order matters) that achieve a given length.
  • Efficiency:
    Since you iterate over lengths up to high, the solution works in ( O(\text{high}) ) time, which is acceptable given the constraints.

Code Implementation

Python Code

Python3
Python3

. . . .

Java Code

Java
Java

. . . .

Complexity Analysis

  • Time Complexity:
    The algorithm iterates from 0 to high, and for each state performs constant-time updates. Therefore, the time complexity is ( O(\text{high}) ).

  • Space Complexity:
    An array of size high + 1 is used, resulting in a space complexity of ( O(\text{high}) ).

Step-by-Step Walkthrough & Visual Example

Consider an example where:

  • low = 3, high = 3, zero = 1, one = 1
  1. Initialization:

    • ( dp[0] = 1 ) (the empty string).
  2. Iteration:

    • For ( i = 0 ):
      • ( i + zero = 1 ): Update ( dp[1] ) becomes ( dp[1] + dp[0] = 1 ).
      • ( i + one = 1 ): Again update ( dp[1] ) (but since both operations add a character and here both zero and one are 1, they contribute twice).
        However, note that in this example with both operations having the same cost, each step doubles the ways; so, ( dp[1] = 2 ) (if both operations are allowed distinctly).
    • For ( i = 1 ):
      • ( i + 1 = 2 ): ( dp[2] ) gets updated from ( dp[1] ).
    • For ( i = 2 ):
      • ( i + 1 = 3 ): ( dp[3] ) gets updated from ( dp[2] ).
  3. Summing the Range:

    • The final answer is ( dp[3] ) since low = high = 3, which will equal ( 2^3 = 8 ).

Note: When the increments differ (for example, zero = 1 and one = 2), the pattern of contributions changes. The DP table correctly accumulates the number of ways by combining the results from both operations while skipping invalid lengths.

Common Mistakes

  • Not Using Modulo at Every Step:
    Failing to take the modulo during the DP update can lead to integer overflow.

  • Incorrect Range Summation:
    Make sure to sum only over lengths in the range ([low, high]) and not from 0 to high.

  • Off-by-One Errors:
    When iterating through the DP array, ensure that you do not access indices beyond high.

Edge Cases & Alternative Variations

  • Edge Case 1:
    When low equals high, you are only interested in strings of one specific length.

  • Edge Case 2:
    When zero and one are the same, the problem reduces to counting the number of ways to sum to a target using only one type of move (which results in powers of 2).

  • Alternative Variation:
    Some variations might ask for “at least” a certain number of ways or might change the operations allowed. The DP approach can often be adjusted accordingly.

  • Coin Change Problems:
    Similar in nature where you count the number of ways to make change for a given amount using coins with fixed denominations.

  • Combination Sum:
    Problems where you build numbers (or strings) by summing fixed values.

  • Knapsack Variants:
    Counting the number of ways to fill a knapsack given weight increments.

  • Other DP on Sequences:
    Problems that involve constructing sequences under certain constraints using dynamic programming.

TAGS
leetcode
CONTRIBUTOR
Design Gurus Team
-

GET YOUR FREE

Coding Questions Catalog

Design Gurus Newsletter - Latest from our Blog
Boost your coding skills with our essential coding questions catalog.
Take a step towards a better tech career now!
Explore Answers
How to crack a job in Atlassian?
How to study AI for beginners?
2658. Maximum Number of Fish in a Grid - Detailed Explanation
Learn to solve Leetcode 2658. Maximum Number of Fish in a Grid with multiple approaches.
Related Courses
Image
Grokking the Coding Interview: Patterns for Coding Questions
Grokking the Coding Interview Patterns in Java, Python, JS, C++, C#, and Go. The most comprehensive course with 476 Lessons.
Image
Grokking Modern AI Fundamentals
Master the fundamentals of AI today to lead the tech revolution of tomorrow.
Image
Grokking Data Structures & Algorithms for Coding Interviews
Unlock Coding Interview Success: Dive Deep into Data Structures and Algorithms.
Image
One-Stop Portal For Tech Interviews.
Copyright © 2025 Design Gurus, LLC. All rights reserved.
;